🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.